Not a great start with Google Plus

The rules on what is suitable for display on G+ posts are rather fuzzy to say the least.  I received my first warning when I posted the three pics below in a Speedo community which is public.

I suppose I can understand what the problem was with the first pic.  It's the visibility of what's inside the speedo that's likely to have caused offence.  I immediately took all the pics down and was about to replace them with the one below, but thought the obvious hardon might get me my second warning and an automatic suspension!  However, I need not have worried, because I later found this very same pic had been posted earlier and was still up there, with no problems. 

Problem with the second pic?  I'm still not sure.  Hands too suggestively close to the equipment?  But I found the next one posted on the same group, again a while back and no problems.  So why ban my pic?

Back to the visible junk ... what about the next four?  Admittedly none is quite as extreme as mine, but they all leave little to the imagination, and again, all are on the Speedo Community page and have been for a while, no problems.

Could it be pubic hair?  No, that doesn't seem to be an issue, as you will see in the next three pics.

Finally, it seems we can post pics of very visible hardons, so long as they are thinly covered by fabric, no matter how revealing.  These are all, again, from the same community page, all there for a while, no problems.

Finally, I started to wonder if it was just the plain size of the speedo bulge I was posting.  While I see it as beautifully masculine, a magnificent display of male sexuality, some may regard it as obscene.  But then what about the lovely pics below, all acceptable on the same community page.

So I'm left with one conclusion.  The guys at Mountain View have it in for me.  They visit this blog frequently, either in person or using some sort of surveillance software, but so far the blog is fine.  But I still cannot see why my second and third pics were banned, and, to put it mildly, I'm extremely annoyed about it.  But there's no point in going head to head with the prudes at Google who, only a month or two back, decided they were going to ban all porn blogs.  Public outcry got them to reverse that decision, to their credit.  But that still leaves me waiting for my next warning, after which my account will be punitively suspended for ten days (I think) during which time I am supposed to mull over the error of my ways.  Then I'm allowed to carry on until my third warning arrives, when I will be informed that my account is permanently suspended.  I know, because I've been through it all before.  So, guys at Mountain View, if you're reading this you might like to e-mail me a response.  Or not.